Marketers are, at best, exaggerators and, at worst, outright liars. Their purpose, generally speaking, is to persuade you into thinking you have a need that you likely don’t and then to convince you that this need can be filled by this thing or that thing which they happen to be selling.
The immense scale on which marketers operate has led to a very regrettable state in which our dreams and imaginations are tied to rampant, mindless, unsustainable consumerism. Instead of wrestling with the internal barriers which keep us from being the people we want to be or from doing the things we want to do, our present condition leads us to treat desirable human characteristics or necessary life experiences as commodities that can be bought and sold.
The Boy Who Wanted To Freelance
In the autumn of 2007, I wanted nothing more than to be a freelancer. I didn’t, however, have the slightest idea of how to be one. I was completely lost. Were I part of a reasonable society, I might have been inclined to interview working freelancers, build a website through which potential clients could contact me or start emailing local businesses who had websites I found to be lacking. Experience is, after all, the only true way you can ever know about how to do anything.
But instead of being a freelance web designer, my instinct was to purchase those things which I knew freelance web designers to have. I more than willingly went into debt: $500 for a Mac Mini, $600 for Photoshop, $30 for some Moleskine notebooks, $800 for a digital camera, $100 for a desk, $50 for a decent office chair, $15 for a copy of “How to be a Graphic Designer without Losing Your Soul” (which I never actually read.) With all of this in my possession, I was able to feel like a true designer.
The problem, of course, is that I wasn’t.
I looked like someone who could design a web site, but the truth was that I hadn’t bothered with anything even resembling web design since I was twelve years old. I only vaguely knew HTML (Year 2000 HTML, mind you) and had absolutely no idea what CSS was. I went into debt to be a well-equipped hack. For whatever reason, I had felt that having these material goods would somehow make my designs beautiful, my code clean, my clients plentiful and my wallet fat. Instead, I was now hopelessly in debt and still had to do the real work of learning to be a designer and a project manager and a programmer. Things that take time and brain power.
I could have saved myself a lot of money had I realized that doing the thing I want to do or being the person I want to be is just a matter of either choosing to do or choosing to be. The truth is that I already owned all that I needed for the process.
The Object And The Story
Recently I stumbled onto an article about American Girl, a subsidiary of Mattel that produces high-end historical dolls for young girls. A visit to one of their stores — American Girl Place, as they are called — provides you with the opportunity to purchase a doll that comes with a backstory in book form for around $95. Also available for equally ridiculous prices are a variety of outfits (for the dolls and also matching outfits for their human owners), a sampling of period-style furniture, a pet, hobbies and recreational pastimes, health care, hair care, the opportunity to have a picture taken with your doll and also the opportunity to have lunch with your doll or to take in a show. A single trip to the store could easily total $1000. The existence — let alone the success — of such a place speaks volumes about the unfortunate pervasiveness of marketing.
Our capacities for creativity peak in our youth when we are least susceptible to the opinions of others. Childhood playtimes are fueled by unadulterated imagination. As a boy, I’d mount my cheap Huffy bicycle and roll over an aluminum soda can, ensuring that the middle got completely smashed and the edges wrapped around the wheel. As I rode, the can would stall at the fork just under the seat and let out a vibrant roar that would grow louder the faster the pedals moved. At that moment, the bicycle became a motorcycle, the trees became monsters, the paths worn in the grass became roads and I became some sort of renegade-monster-slaying-force-to-be-reckoned-with.
And while my eight-year-old self was perfectly content with such a set up, marketers like those at American Girl would suggest that I’d have had more fun if my bicycle was actually shaped like a motorcycle and, instead of the can, it had a speaker which burst with the rumbling of an actual engine when pedaled. And what’s a renegade without a leather jacket and an eyepatch? And what would his adventure be without life-sized, plastic-molded, karate-chopping, eye-glowing, demon-shaped antagonists? And all of this for the low, low price of $349.95!
For me, marketers have been and always will be thieves. We all have this inborn capacity to imagine, free-of-charge, a world that isn’t and, for a time, to live within that world. We all have this capacity to be, free-of-charge, who we want to be and to do, free-of-charge, what we dream of doing. All three of these capacities are inborn. They are our stories. Marketers attempt to steal these stories and sell them back to us. Our dolls can’t have personalities without overpriced period-style furniture and matching outfits. Our bicycles can’t be motorcycles without expensive shells and a rumbling speaker. We can’t be designers without a Mac Mini and Photoshop.
We must realize that our stories are our own and that, while marketers may tell us otherwise, all of our dreams, desires and goals can be realized utilizing only our free-of-charge inborn capacities… if we so choose.
If we are to move away from these lives we are certain don’t fit us — and with this I mean to say, if we are to truly revolt against the status quo — we all must make it a priority to adopt a minimalist lifestyle. Minimalism is, as you probably know, a rejection of the superfluous. First, it means having only what we need and, second, it means that of the things we need we only buy those which we can’t get otherwise.
And, most importantly, we ought not buy anything that promises us that which only we can accomplish.
Related posts
- The Architect and the Slave
- How to Find Your Core in a Shell of Ambiguity
- What Aspiring Freelancers Can Learn From The World’s Greatest Web App Company
- In Pursuit of Being
- Required Reading for the Rebellious





Hey, I'm JD. I'm a writer, web designer and contrarian entrepreneur. Wage Slave Rebel is a place where I (and others) explore alternative and ethical ways to earn a living apart from the corporate hierarchy. The goal of this site is to help people escape wage slavery and start reaping the full rewards of their skills and passions. 
Hey JD
I love your personal stories that you put into your posts and the lessons we can learn from them. Marketers are indeed out there to sell as much as possible, they dont care how they do it and what the effects are , as long as they make sales.
Thanks for sharing
I don't trust marketers. They are purposefully inauthentic.
Hmmm… but didn't you end up becoming a free-lancer? So maybe it was a worthwile investment after all?
Buying all the things freelancers had was just a speed bump to actually becoming a freelancer. I could have just as easily kept the Compaq computer and the pirated copy of Photoshop to start and then bought what I needed as my skills started paying off.
You could have… but you didn't.
Just want to point out that you are not alone in this kind of 'fake it till you make it' approach.
The most memorable case I can think of is Steven Spielberg who found an unused office in a hollywood studio and turned up every day with a briefcase (in which he kept his lunch).
Reminds me of: 'Be, Do, Have'
Hey JD,
Awesome post as usual. Your passion is evident in every post, and your ability to learn from your mistakes is beyond your age.
My favorite evil marketers are the ones that sell lay people drugs that the doctors know wouldn't do us any good and wouldn't prescribe, by telling us to ask our doctors if we can use them (not in so many words)
Keep up the good work bro.
Rasheed
Exactly, Rasheed. I've always wondered why it wasn't illegal to advertise prescription drugs in the United States.
I mean 'worthwhile'
Haha. Oh, I so had a Mac, Photoshop, and a moleskine before learning design. And I spent hundreds of dollars on American Girl dolls (knock offs – my parents were a little smart). And my bike (though not a Huffy) may also have been an imaginary motorcycle. Did you steal my life?
I think the job of marketers should be to connect an audience that needs something to the providers of what they need. Unfortunately, that doesn't seem to be satisfying enough.
I'm not sure if it would be possible to connect people with what they actually need. It seems like if they did that, it would cease to be marketing. It would just be… I don't know… downright useful and probably not profitable.
I'm also happy to learn that I'm not the only one who had an imaginary motorcycle!
Well in the end you can now say you are a designer, so maybe it was all worth it after all? I just noticed Neil said the same thing, but I will echo him, rather than retype the previous statement.
There is a point here though, just because you look and feel like something doesn't mean that is what you are. "You are not what you own". So very true.
I'm a freelance designer now, but I don't credit that to having a Moleskine or a Mac. It came from experience, from messing things up, from reading and doing and asking questions. I could have just as easily become a designer with a composition book and Linux on a Compaq.
I've found that rewarding myself with the trappings of success has encouraged me to learn and move forward more quickly professionally.
For example, when I started learning design, I had an antiquated PC which I used to learn Photoshop, Illustrator, InDesign, Flash, Freehand (this was a while ago!), etc; all skills that I used to take on a few projects, using the money gained to purchase myself a G5 (the precursor to today's Mac Pro….like I said, this was a while ago).
I've continued to do this until very recently, and it's incredibly satisfying to feel like I've used a set of rudimentary skills to create a business around those skills…there's no loss or investment on my part other than time, and out of that time I've created something out of nothing.
All that being said, as I've become more minimalistic (and sold everything except what fits in my carry-on bag), I've had to find other ways to reward myself. These days I'm more likely to take a day trip or snag a nice piece of software as a reward instead of buying something tangible (though I suppose this fact just goes to show that even though I'm able to move away from the physical consumption of resources, I haven't yet been able to escape the tendrils of consumerism!).
Great post, JD!
I consider this to be the opposite of what I did and this is what I'd recommend people to do. I should have let my skills dictate and provide the necessary upgrades. Having already gotten experience with design, you had a better idea of what you needed and what would benefit you. You also had the money to pay for it. You evolved and I bullshitted. Instead of designing, I decided to look like a designer. Consumption didn't do much to progress my business. In many ways it hindered it because I had to deal with software I didn't really know and an operating system I didn't know. And with the Moleskine, I still haven't figured out why I need it. I have two that are mostly blank. Can't find a way to work it into my process.
Still, though, I think rewarding yourself by buying objects (tangible or intangible) isn't a particularly good habit to pick up since it reinforces this concept of "more is better". Buying an experience is much more acceptable. The costs of a day trip are secondary to the experience. I think the less we buy, though, the better off we are, the more content we are.
By the way, if there's something I might buy in the near future, it'd be InDesign. I'm really getting into typography and the printing process. I'll have to download the trial and just play around with it.
But isn't it funny how you often hear from people that have 'made it' that how they went about it was all wrong and that it's much better to do it in 'X Y Z' manner which is much more safe / sensible.
It's like Bill Gates telling people not to drop out of college, yet that's what he did. Spielberg telling people to not hassle studio executives, yet that's what he did. Richard Branson telling teenagers not to set up their own businesses and not to take risks, yet that's what he did.
Ok maybe there is a bias in that we only hear about the successful 'risk takers' and not the ones that lost it all. Still you have to take some risks in life in order to get ahead.
You just described the beauty of minimalism. As someone who is still trying to mold my ideal minimalist lifestyle, the constant assault from marketers still gets to me at times.
My poverty has been a very effective combatant in the war against marketers.
ooh, another controversial post. Dude, you are shooting from the hip lately and I like it.
Me, I love marketing. I'm new to it, but learing a ton from all of the available info/advice/help out there. I'm currently writing a book and I can't wait to sell/market/advertise the shit out of that baby. Because, here is the key, for me at least- I BELIEVE FULLY IN WHAT I'M DOING. Sorry to yell, but I felt I had to stress that point. Now, if we are talking about to marketing or selling something that I don't believe it, that would be torture.
If marketing is free of superlatives and exaggeration and amounts to an honest description of a product, that's cool with me. If it's about making something sound like it's the greatest thing on earth so as to influence someone to purchase it, to me that's dishonest and unacceptable. I think the former is less likely to encourage mindless consumption.
My problem isn't with you or anyone selling a book. I hope to sell a few books myself some day soon. My biggest problem is when marketers use less-than-honest techniques. For example, when Toyota launched the Yaris, they paid MadTV to do a sketch parodying it. There wasn't a disclaimer mentioning that the parody was actually a paid advertisement. Most marketers encourage parody because any exposure, even "negative" exposure, really just promotes the brand. This subliminal highjacking of our mental landscapes is unacceptable.
The sad truth is that marketers knew the fallible nature of man, and they operate on this weakness. Awareness of thyself is a learning process that must evolve if we are to live a life of sense. Charlatans will never be without gullible people.
JD. I know this post isn’t fresh, but I loved your last reply to the comment above. It’s what I was really looking for in this post.
I agree with you, but I’m so torn. I believe creatively promoting your product, or any product you really believe in, is appropriate and I would encourage it. That being said…there is no way to draw a black and white line on what would qualify as malicious mental hijacking like mentioned above and an earnest creative attempt to persuade someone that what you are offering is awesome except having a solid moral compass. Pure intentions by the seller, and promoting awareness (which I think you exemplify in your experiences in this post) are the keys to noble buying and selling. I’m encouraged because most lifestyle designers I’ve come across seem to have that knowledge.
Are your intentions to earn as many dollars as you can, and sell some stuff, or to create value and meaning, then make some dollars? Thanks as usual for making me think. The site redesign is bangin too. .-= Robert´s last blog ..The Workflow of Work | Momentum Building =-.